BBS:      TELESC.NET.BR
Assunto:  RE: Right to Life
De:       Arelor
Data:     Tue, 31 Mar 2026 04:33:31 -0500
-----------------------------------------------------------
  hbRenb: hcRE: Right to Life
  bBynb: hcDumas Walker bto cMATTHEW MUNSON bon cSun Mar 29 2026 10:18 amn

 >
 > I think if someone is bad off enough, they should have the right to choose
 > for themselves.
 >
 > That said, they should also be shielded from the government encouraging
 > them to choose assisted suicide if that is *not* what they want.

This is a common subject at work since we have a pain management unit and therefore we have lots of trashed people.

I don't think anybody has objections towards putting people out of their missery, but they have objections about... external interference.

This is fact: a lot of medical decisions are forced on people these days. They bing you a grandpa and you can tell it is the nephew and son and aunt calling all the shots and if grandpa does not want to do something they press and press and press until he yields.

Professionals are pissed off because they are getting euthanasia requests for nothing burguers and they need to waste half an hour telling people and their relatives they are not signing for an euthanasia over an sprained ankle. Specially because that is half an hour they could be devoting to people who actually needs medical services.

Opposite is also true, there are lots of relatives pressing in order to have grandma subsists in a morphine sustained zombie state that everybody else knows is inhuman.


--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
n
---
  gSynchronetn  Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

-----------------------------------------------------------
[Voltar]