BBS:      TELESC.NET.BR
Assunto:  Still with Trump
De:       Vilenihilist
Data:     Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:29:44 -0700
-----------------------------------------------------------
  hbRenb: hcStill with Trump
  bBynb: hcDumas Walker bto cVILENIHILIST bon cTue Mar 24 2026 11:24 amn

 > BTW, if you look at the numbers,
 > despite Trump's campaign claims, Oba > was also imprisoning / turning back
 > decent numbers, too.
 > 
 > > It doesn't have to be nefarious, i > > an issue of priorities. Biden
 > > preferredthe risk of catch and
 > > release to
 > > a large dragnet holding many peopl > > whoreally didn't need to be held u > > that way, and Trump would rather g > > cats and figure out where to hold
 > > them later.
 > 
 > I didn't claim it was nefarious, but > that it was not smart.  I also don't > think that turning loose a bunch of  > agents in various cities is smart,
 > either, but that is what happens aft > a few years of just turning people
 > loose on this side of the border.
 > 
 > If anything, that might have been th > reason there... break something so
 > then you can complain about how the
 > other side does an equally silly 180 > try to correct it.
 > 
 > Yeah, that sounds dumb but we are
 > talking about US politicians, and I
 > seriously wonder if we could ever
 > assemble a bigger group of dummies t > the current lot we have.

To the point of Obama's policies, the
main counter argument of liberals is 
that a vast quantity of his numbers
were people turned away directly at
the border; to my knowledge that is 
true. And to be frank I don't have 
as many issues with actual BORDER
policy. 

For the record, I don't count myself 
among "liberals" anymore; for one,
non-MAGA republicans and most Democratsare all liberals, of different
opinions.  I consider myself to the 
left of liberals, generally.

Anyhow, I don't think ANY president
can or should have the power to 
mass expel people on the basis of
race or origin in the way we do, 
because that ability to do so 
can be turned on you and me just
as easily, and it violates all 
of our 4th amendment rights in
particular, and increases the
potential use of the 2nd. People
forget that even when IKE did this
Texans got in their pickups and 
hunted down US Marshalls who were
mass deporting Mexicans because 
of the mass violation of their rights.

And that wasn't near as harsh as what
Trump is doing with ICE. However bad
a previous president botched
immigration does not give the next 
president the right to violate
American's rights in the name of 
convenience for his agencies, but
that is what is happening.

I would rather abolish DHS as a whole,
reimplement the agencies as they 
existed in the 90s, make sure the
communications issues that were 
the cause for DHS are not reintroduced
and then provide paths for citizenship
for non-criminal undocumented migrants
combined with a punitive tax just largeenough to dissuade illegal migration.
Increase the amount of judges for 
deportation cases, and work with 
sanctuary state to ensure that they
will inform the newly-reformed INS of
illegals currently imprisoned. Which
 I might add, is something that 
already happens. 







--Just Post, World Is A Fuck!--

This Quality Shit-Post Brought 
To You Via Commodore 64 Ultimate
n
---
  mSynchronetn  hgVertrauen n hHome of Synchronet n gh[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

-----------------------------------------------------------
[Voltar]