BBS:      TELESC.NET.BR
Assunto:  SynchroNet Oneliners
De:       Accession
Data:     Thu, 12 Feb 2026 18:47:00 -0600
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hey Codefenix!

On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:03:54 -0500, you wrote:

 Ac>> I've never used either, so I didn't realize the difference. Could
 Ac>> (or is) the above even used with multiple "hubs" that can still
 Ac>> connect to each other? Or is there still one designated hub that
 Ac>> everyone chooses to connect to?

 > Do you mean for prolonged hub downtimes which might prompt a NC change?
 > I imagine what holds true for standard hub-node polling holds true for
 > this, since it's just messages sent through an echo.

Eh, no? I was referring to and asking about how IBOL works (apologies, "prompt a NC change" kinda threw me off above). But, from your answer, I /think/ you're saying that there is still a single point of failure, just that if the hub actually does go down, all of your oneliners still stay on your system, and can still be added to locally, until the data echo continues flowing the actual data?

I was more asking something in the lines of similar to linking to many "feeds" for that one echo, and letting dupe detection sort it out (like I do with Fidonet). Except, this would only be for the oneliners. So, I guess in the sense of IBOL, can you link to net 1, 2, 3, and 4 for that data echo so that if one of those systems were to go down, you would still pass around oneliners from the other 3 networks/hubs ?

Regards,
Nick

... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409
 * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/1)
  Synchronet  _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)

-----------------------------------------------------------
[Voltar]