BBS: TELESC.NET.BR Assunto: How much time is AI reall De: Mike Powell Data: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 10:06:19 -0500 ----------------------------------------------------------- > MP>I am not too surprised. I think in a lot of fields, management is in a > >rush to save money/time but the fields in question are not ones that AI is > >aptly suited for yet. > I think a lot of companies don't want to be left behind and end > up trying to do things with it that are not suited, or are not > waiting until the AI has been fully tested. All the AI providers > want to be first and don't seem to care if they are not 'best'.. Well, if they see a payday they certainly are not likely to point out that they are not the "best" for the task. :D > MP>Yes, and you still very much need to verify the accuracy before just > >following the rules. The other day, I was look an air frier recipe up > >online. Google's AI assistant (Gemini, or whatever you get from them for > >free with a google search) was suggesting that I add oil to the air frier > >pan. > MP>As I was not trying to make fire, I did not do so! > Ha.. yes, and they are running into similar problems when people ask > AI for medical advice. Yep! > RM>> Another story aso went into some of the simplest things that > >> AI is terrible at doing. In one example they asked an AI system > >> something like how many L's were in the word 'Collectively' and > >> it came up with several different answers each time asked. > MP>Yes, that is the one I was referencing above... they have difficulty > >counting things like that which, IMHO, might also make them bad at > >verifying test results. > 4 out of 3 people can't do math... B) Something like that. You would think that would be an easier task but I guess there must be more to it than I would think. Mike * SLMR 2.1a * "Silence. Music's original alternative. Roots-grunge!" --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/107) ----------------------------------------------------------- [Voltar]