BBS:      TELESC.NET.BR
Assunto:  Technology is never neutral
De:       Mike Powell
Data:     Wed, 27 May 2026 08:30:00 -0500
-----------------------------------------------------------
'Technology is never neutral': the Pope says the quiet part out loud, and 
it's time we accept that AI and tech's failures  and dangers  are human-made

Date:
Tue, 26 May 2026 16:16:42 +0000

Description:
Pope Leo's Encyclical, 'Magnifica humanitas,' has many warnings about the 
dangers of unfettered AI, but it's what he says more broadly about technology 
that really resonates.

FULL STORY
Technology is so pervasive that
it's often simultaneously sold as the cure for all ills and the source of 
everyone's problems. Most rational people  including, it seems, the Pope  
don't believe this. 

In his recent Papal Encyclical, the relatively new Pope Leo wrote extensively 
about the threats artificial Intelligence poses to humanity, but also buried 
among the 42,300 words was this: "In the abstract, technology in and of 
itself is not a solution to humanity's problems, just as it is not inherently 
evil. In practice, however, technology is never neutral, because it takes on 
the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate and use it." 

It's not a new thought, but it's notable because, well, it's the leader of 
the world's 1.4 billion Catholics saying it, and it's also putting a fine 
point on the pivotal role that tech plays in our lives, and how we tend to 
both oversell and undersell its impact. 

Technology writ large is just another tool, not a force for good or for evil; 
and its effects, for good and ill, will depend on who wields it, and how. 
Whose point a view? AI, of course, changes that equation, because people see  
or at least infer  agency in its actions. Its prompt-driven conversations 
with us sound rich with a consciousness that's not there. ChatGPT, Gemini, 
and Claude often appear to have a point of view. 

They don't  and I think much of the Pope's document puts the onus on humanity 
to wrest control of the narrative from AI. It's not smart or powerful enough 
to act on our behalf, and certainly not in our best interests, but doing 
nothing and letting future AI develop unfettered is most certainly a recipe 
for disaster.

This, though, connects to another thought in the Pope's statement. He writes 
that "technology is never neutral." One could argue that, by extension, AI 
isn't neutral either. 

As generative AI inches closer to general artificial intelligence (GAI), or 
something approximating human intelligence, it does not necessarily shed the 
initial bias of its early training (or as the Pope wrote, " the 
characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate and use it") . 

In the last few years, OpenAI and Google have worked diligently to rid 
ChatGPT and Gemini , respectively, of bias, but there are so many avenues  
data collection, labelling, training, how the systems are deployed  through 
which bias can causally enter the training that it's hard to believe they've 
scrubbed it all.  Even as they do the work, the Pope's
point resonates. After all, AI remains largely unregulated, with states in 
the US and governing bodies like the European Union playing catch-up, and 
working, as bureaucracy often does, at about a third of the speed of AI 
development (see ' AI Time '); which means it's up to us to remember that AI 
and tech are not inherently good or bad, and also not neutral. 

The goal then should be for humans to act as the filter, constantly asking, 
how are we using these tools, and asking, what does that answer mean? Does 
the AI understand the goal, and does it take into account broader 
perspectives and ramifications? The answers will likely be no, which means 
it's our job to take a closer look at the end product AI is delivering and 
then process it for human consumption. 

To be fair to the companies building these AI systems, the notion of tech 
neutrality and trust is not novel to AI. After all, the advent of broadband, 
access to the world's information, social media, and misinformation at scale 
predates generative AI access by decades. 

We are not by nature a discerning people. We take the information provided on 
our various platforms for granted. No wonder, then, that when AI started 
confidently telling us falsehoods or misrepresenting people, we took it as 
truth. 

As Einstein never said , "I fear the day when the technology overlaps with 
our humanity. The world will only have a generation of idiots." It's a quote 
widely misattributed to the genius, but also a valuable reminder: tech and AI 
are tools, and if we don't get a handle on them, we're just a bunch of tools. 
The Pope could've written that, too.

Link to news story:
https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/technology-is-never-neutral-
the-pope-says-the-quiet-part-out-loud-and-its-time-we-accept-that-ai-and-techs
-failures-and-dangers-are-human-made

$$
--- MultiMail/DOS
 * Origin: Capitol City Hub (1:2320/105)

-----------------------------------------------------------
[Voltar]