BBS:      TELESC.NET.BR
Assunto:  Re: Has Iran been defeate
De:       Max Stubbs
Data:     Wed, 1 Apr 2026 07:56:30 -0700
-----------------------------------------------------------
  Re: Re: Has Iran been defeate
  By: IB Joe to Max Stubbs on Tue Mar 31 2026 03:30 pm

 > The Supreme court did not say that..
 > Not even close... Presidents have
 > immunity from the consequences of do
 > their JOB.
 > 
 > Barry killed 1000s of innocent peopl
 > during drone strikes... since he wou
 > have argued he was doing so to prote
 > the American people... he even drone
 > struck a US citizen in Yemen... No D
 > Process just dead... and Barry would
 > have argued he was protecting the
 > people... and would have won.
 > 
 > If Barry was out robbing banks, not
 > part of his Job description, he coul
 > be impeached, if still in office, an
 > could have seen the legal system wor
 > 
 > Lets just say for a moment that Barr
 > weaponized the government to go afte
 > the president coming into office...
 > note this is not part of his job
 > description... He can be held
 > accountable.

The problem is, any President can now
claim ANYTHING they did was part of
their job. Imagine if Nixon said those
tapes were kept because they were
needed in the course of his work as
President to keep internal tabs and so
everyone can eat fuckin rocks, and the
court was like "yeah that checks out."

And yeah, if a presient kills a US
Citizen extrajudicially, regardless of
whether they deserve it, then I DO
think the President should have to
account for that. Just like Trump
should have to account for how his
policy decisions result in things like
ICE killin people or violatin the 4th
amendment, as a policy decision. That's
my point. The President was NEVER
supposed to be elevated above the
people. He is supposed to be OF the
people, and share our rights and
consequences. I don't give a fuck who
th president is, the executive should
never, NEVER get a free pass on
criminality. Wanna delay it till after
th presidency is over? That is a
conversation perhaps that could be had.
But ALL are meant to be equal under the
law, or else we don't have law at all.
These exceptions and immunities are an
insult to the American people and
should not be permitted. And I'd say
this for any presient of any party.
It's the same reason I think the
filibuster should be removed, despite
the fact it would allow the GOP to run
their agenda right now. Because the
most important thing in this country is
that we actually enforce our democratic
principles. These exceptions undermine
our system of government and are
actively harmful.



--Just Post, World Is A Fuck!--

This Quality Shit-Post Brought 
To You Via Commodore 64 Ultimate
--- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

-----------------------------------------------------------
[Voltar]